Lately I've been pondering the issue of experts and research. The narrative is that there is a lot of misinformation out there that is dangerous and leading people to making bad decisions that are catastrophic to our health.
Covid is such an interesting time. Recently someone who I know said on someone else's Facebook thread that she's concerned that "stay-at-home Mormon moms" seem to not be getting vaccinated in high enough numbers. She thinks we should consult a scientist because trying to understand something yourself is dangerous and that we are uniformed. The stay-at-home Mormon mom statement is something that is incredibly belittling because it doesn't take into account any education, training, etc but reduces these women to just a "Mormon mom." While I am a "mom" (why is Mormon or mom relevant?) I do have a Bachelors of Science degree obtained through a scholarship to BYU, a competitive university. I studied anatomy, physiology, chemistry, microbiology, biology, physical science, research methods, statistics, and more. I've always tested well and was told my whole life I could be whatever I wanted to be. Now I have this "feminist" flight attendant on Facebook telling me not to use my brain. The irony.
And then I've seen other memes shaming people who say to "do your own research" because they aren't scientists. While it is kinda funny and I see their point, I didn't know the term "research" was something that only paid scientists can do? That seems elitist. Anyway, the dictionary finds that there are many different types of research:
Definition of research:
1. Careful or diligent search
2. Studious Inquiry or Examination
especially: investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of such new or revised theories or laws
3. The collecting of information about a particular subject
First off, I'm surprised that these self-described feminists would be so patronizing to women and specifically moms in general. They seem to be saying that we can only trust scientists. Using your own brain or intuition is dangerous. I don't buy this dialogue and think that of all the dangers regarding covid, rubber stamping a chosen narrative and not being allowed to question is the most damning part of this whole pandemic. Reminds me of a medieval priest and the atrocities and power that came with being the only ones able to interpret the bible.
Since then, I've been compiling a list of scientists, researchers and research articles that interest me and share some of my concerns. While I don't rely on my own research, I do find that there are scientists who have dissenting opinions that I feel make a lot of sense.
The scientific method begins with a question. Using sound research, it allows explore a hypothesis. And replication and other methods prove or disprove those findings. There is no "settled science." That statement itself is anti-science. Science is constantly changing and evolving. We gain new information that becomes widely accepted and then discredited on a regular basis.
I loved what Peter Doshi has to say. I read what many scientists have to say from all sides of the spectrum. I have my own bias of my history of adverse events and other things that I'm sure play a role in how I view the world. And yet, I think that might be why I am more open minded to the critical aspects of this whole thing. If Miles had not had an adverse reaction and I hadn't witnessed with my own eyes the anti-science response, I would have not believed it. And I would have continued doing what I'd always done. Leaving the thinking to those I believed to be experts.
Anyway, I have a good brain and I can understand logic and reasoning just fine. Peter Doshi is an expert who is asking the questions I also have. His words were very validating to me when I first read them a couple months ago. Fundamentally he believes that we have to have dialogue and ask question otherwise science is rotted out. Here is his background and below are some of his articles and a video that I found interesting.
From the BMJ website Background: Peter Doshi is a senior editor at The BMJ and on the News & Views team. Based in Baltimore, he is also an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. His research focuses on the drug approval process, how the risks and benefits of medical products are assessed and communicated, and improving the credibility and accuracy of evidence synthesis and biomedical publications. Doshi campaigns for greater transparency of clinical trial data and leads the Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials (RIAT) initiative, which aims to ensure clinical trial publications are accurate, complete, and data are publicly available. Doshi also has strong interests in journalism as a vehicle for encouraging better practice and improving the research enterprise. Doshi completed a fellowship in comparative effectiveness research at Johns Hopkins and received his PhD in history, anthropology, and science, technology and society from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/peter-doshi-u-s-senator-ron-johnson-holds-panel-in-dc-on-covid-19-vaccine-mandates-and-injuries_LWTWpHPVdy2Ye6U.html Link to 5 min video. Excellent points!
Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity?
Covid-19 vaccines: In the rush for regulatory approval, do we need more data?
Peter Doshi: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines—we need more details and the raw data
Does the FDA think these data justify the first full approval of a covid-19 vaccine?
The bottom line is we cannot ignore the other risks that come with vaccination. While there is a short term immunity gained from vaccination, what cost is coming with that short lived immunity? I believe people should have true informed consent. Which requires knowing the safety of a drug. And no one should be forced to receive a medical product. To me that is fundamentally wrong.
I'm not an expert, and I don't have years of background as a scientist or medical professional. I have no doubt that watching people suffering and dying from Covid is excruciating and exhausting. I want covid to go away. But I also want assurance that we aren't injecting a low risk and/or already immune population with something that can cause all kinds of other health emergencies. Perhaps cardiac issues that a hospitalist or nurse who treats covid may not see or connect as vaccine related without good information and data. There are questions that are valid that need answers.
If you've read my previous posts about these issues, I've updated them with source links for some of the videos and research articles that were not previously linked.


